Tipu Sultan The dictator sovereign for the British whose citation is a source of pride for Muslims indeed moment
Tipu Sultan wasn't an raider, he didn't come then from anywhere differently.
He was more attached to his native land than numerous Indian autocrats.
To say that they were bushwhackers is a sign of a big misreading.
Chroniclers with a keen eye on the reign of Tipu Sultan, king of a medieval Indian state, and his reign aren't surprised by the contestation over the picking of a demesne in Mumbai after him, as Sultan and his father Haider Ali had several wars.
This new contestation against the only sovereign of the country who was killed on the battleground while fighting the British in the 18th century is grounded on the stories spread about him rather of the factual' literal' fact about him.
At least one annalist agrees that given the current opposition to Tipu Sultan, the idea of naming a demesne or playground after him may feel obnoxious to a particular group of people at first regard.
Tipu Sultan was a public idol
Speaking to BBC Hindi, Professor Sebastien Joseph, Professor of Tipu Chair at the University of Mysore, said"The people of Maharashtra may not know that Tipu Sultan was a public idol because until the 19th century there was no'One India'or any Indianness.
There was no identification. He says that at that time Maratha, Bengal or Mysore was the identity.
But what amazes chroniclers is that Tipu Sultan was"one of the most ruthless raiders in southern India."
"They weren't bushwhackers, they did not come then from anywhere differently,"says Janaki Nair, a sheltered professor of history at Delhi's Jawaharlal Nehru University. He was more attached to his native land than numerous Indian autocrats. To say that they were bushwhackers. It's a big misreading about this person."
"Tipu is one of the great loyalists who fought against the concerted forces of the British, the Marhats and the Hyderabad governance,"says NV Narasimha, a professor of history.
It's because of prejudice that such a crusade is being launched against them that they're the number one adversary of the country.
Tipu and Pishwa
"
People who do not know history hate Tipu,"says Professor Narasimha. But he doesn't say so about the Hyderabad system which joined hands with the British and the Marhats to fight Tipu Sultan.
He gave the illustration of Srinagar friary and said that the Swami ( religious leader) of this friary had to flee to Karkala to escape the attack led by Maratha Raja Raghunath Rao Patwardhan.
Professor Narasimhaya says'The Maratha or Peshwa army attacked the tabernacle and took down all the beautifiers and profaned the divinities kept there.
Tipu Sultan bestowed whatever the Peshwa stole to the tabernacle.
He wrote several letters to the principal clerk requesting blessings on his subjects.
He did the same in numerous other tabernacles.
Among them is the Ninjan Deshwar Temple which they used to call Hakim Nanjan Da because their eye problems were removed there.
Sanctioned documents also state that Tipu Sultan also handed jewels, beautifiers and protection to Malkot, Kolur Mukambika Temple and numerous other tabernacles.
The history is being used to produce prejudices
Professor Janaki Nair says that the Marathas weren't far behind in waging war.
Indeed moment the souls of the people there fluctuate at the memory of the Marhats who reached Bengal.
They were the autocrats of the 10th century who were obviously veritably cruel.
"The history is being used to produce prejudices,"she says. It isn't being used to produce any literal understanding.
Are they still the icons of the country?
Professor Nair says'Not now. The news of forced transformations and persecutions that are now coming to light was the mood of the 18th century.
This person has seen numerous lives after death.
She says'The first British wrote about him that he was a veritably cruel sovereign.
He fought against the British and was martyred on the battleground.
All this was canceled, because they're Muslims and they had a record of oppression like other autocrats of that time. And of course, they converted some people, but their figures are inflated, while it's clear that they couldn't have ruled the Hindu- maturity country by mass conversion."
Professor Nair says' Actually, Tipu Sultan had six units in his army. Two of these units belonged to the Marhats and Rajputs. They didn't separate between the different status of Muslims.
They didn't separate between the different communities of Marhats and Rajputs. We used to pay everyone a fair payment.
She says chroniclers in the 1960s and'70s were watching Tipu Sultan's profitable plans, agrarian development and the silk assiduity. His plans were" veritably progressive."
In an earlier interview with the BBC, Narendra Panni, a professor at the National Institute of Advanced Studies in Bangalore, quoted in his book'Reform toPre-Empty Changes-Land Legislation in Karnataka'as saying Was directly under the control of the government. It was leased to growers.
This process continued from generation to generation, everyone got lands. But this system is failing in Malabar where there was a separate system of big landlords.
In fact, after Tipu's death, the British themselves espoused Tipu's agrarian system which was named as beach system.
Lord Cornwallis' landed system didn't work in Mysore because Tipu himself had developed the agrarian system there.
It began to be controlled by two specific statements. One so- called conversion involved not promoting religion and the Kannada language and destroying tabernacles.
This is a veritably mixed picture as there's a lot of substantiation that Tipu bestowed a lot to numerous tabernacles.
Chroniclers say that there's a clear literal separation in what history is.