Chile and Pakistan Can a leftist leader take power in Pakistan like Chile? 

 

 The people of Chile, a country on the west seacoast of Latin America, have lately tagged a 35- time-old left- sect youth chairman of their country by a landslide. 

Although the world is wondering about his choice, these changes in Chile didn't be suddenly but there's a continuum behind them. 

In the alternate round of Chile's December 19 presidential election, Gabriel Burke, a former left- sect pupil leader and doubly tagged to the Chilean Congress, entered one million further votes than the right- sect coalition seeker.

 He'll now assume his new liabilities in March. 

 

 Left- sect movements in Latin America, including Chile, are now a major source of alleviation for left- sect movements around the world. 

Lately, the Turkish opposition cited Borik's strategy in Chile as an illustration. 

Analogous debates are taking place among the youth of Pakistan's left sect. Now the issue is being bandied in Pakistan and a dialogue has been arranged on Monday night. 

So what's the future of leftist pupil movements in Pakistan in these circumstances? 

 Opinions of left- sect intellectualists 

After this discussion numerous questions arise in mind whether the events in Chile can be an illustration for scholars or youthful people from other countries, whether it can be a global trend, whether a leader like Gabriel Borik can crop inPakistan.

However, what's the reason, is Pakistan's religious tendency an handicap, If not. 

 To find out, we spoke to some of moment's leading left- sect activists and alumni leaders about whether they can learn a assignment from Chile's metamorphosis, or whether they're two different countries.

 The situation isn't the same in these two countries, so this discussion is useless. 

Or it'll be said that no change can come in Pakistan with military rule. In other words,"If the police kill, how will the revolution come?"

.Dr. Ayesha Jalal The future of the left 

 

Leading annalist Dr Ayesha Jalal before this time, when asked if she saw any future for the Left, said"If you talk to a annalist, I would say that effects are noway the same. At the moment we're at the veritably nethermost of neoliberalism. 

 Description of neoliberalism 

Neo-liberalism is a policy model that includes both politics and economics, according to which control of profitable factors is principally transferred from the government to the private sector.

 Numerous programs ofneo-liberalism strengthen and expand the free request plutocrat system and seek to limit government spending, government regulation and public property. Proponents ofneo-liberalism call it profitable growth. Opponents consider these programs responsible for heightening inequality in society, ie making the rich richer and the poor poorer. 

 

Dr. Ayesha Jalal says, “ We're presently facing a moral extremity due to the epidemic and its worse, which is facing the whole world. 

And I suppose there's a possibility of enhancement and I hope that there will be a return of the Left, but they too will have to change their thinking, keep pace with the times, but in any case from neoliberalism. We've to move on."

 Dr Ayesha added"I suppose the moral extremity that the world is facing right now is an occasion for the Left to move forward and recapture its misplaced ground, but in a slightly different way, They do not have to be poor, they've to work in a new way. 

 

"But now, of course, there's a lot of room for the Left. 

Look at the United States. 

They turned all communists into socialists in the 1950s, linked illiberalism to communism and also crushed them oppressively. 

But because of the moral extremity, people like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have been suitable to push the Democratic Party to the leftism. 

 Dr Ayesha Jalal says' Look at how Jeremy Corbyn came to be in Britain.I suppose the situation is changing, but at the same time the Left needs to acclimatize to the demands of moment's situation, rather of going back to the fifties or sixties."

Dr. Farooq Sulehria, a leftist intellectual from Beacon National University 

.

Dr. Farooq Sulehria, a left- sect ideologue and speaker at Beacon National University, says the process of change in Latin America isn't limited to Chile. In the last twenty-five times in Latin America, numerous progressive movements have sprung up, leading to leaders like Burke. 

 

 The biggest movement againstneo-liberalism in the 1990s was in the form of Zapatista in Mexico, also in Venezuela, Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador, Honduras, Uruguay and other countries. 

In the same time, a youthful socialist academy schoolteacher was tagged chairman in Peru. 

"But the situation in our region is reversed,"saysDr. Sulehria.

 Religious fanaticism has spread everyplace except Nepal.

 India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Iran-all these places were dominated by religious forces rather of the leftism.

 Our progressive movement couldn't recover after the Zia absolutism. 

 

Dr. Farooq Sulehria says, “ We also have youthful leadership. 

Some important names like Manzoor Pashtun, Mohsin Dawar, Ammar Ali Jan, Ali Wazir, Jalila Haider, Alia Haider can be mentioned. 

But they've not yet been suitable to rally the people at the public position. 

 Youthful leadership has surfaced in Pakistan, there's cooperation between them but without any major people's movement, no leader like Bork will crop then.

 When the movement will crop, can noway be prognosticated. So far, people have been mustered from the platforms of major political parties. 

 

 Maryam Nawaz is an illustration of this. (We) have been deceived but still no robotic movement is arising. 

The robotic movement doesn't inescapably give birth to youthful leadership. 

This is a possibility. Still, the internal situation isn't veritably bright because there are no rudiments in civil society that would give rise to a leadership like Borik's or an autocratic movement. 

"The biggest fear is that the coming possible people's movement will be led by religious fanatics,"saysDr. Farooq Sulehria. 

 

 In Chile, the popular process has been going on for 30 times. In Pakistan, it has been suspended in one form or another. 

There's no ban on pupil unions. 

Bork scholars are a product of politics and movement. 

The women's movement is strong there.

 Trade unions are much stronger than we are. It's as if civil society is stronger than we are. 

 According toDr. Sulehria, Chile is the country where, for the first time, the Communist Party, led byDr. Allende, came to power by querying choices rather of a violent revolution (a unique trial in history that failed), with literal and revolutionary traditions.

 The history of Chile is also veritably different from ours.